Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Comparator Specificity and Discriminatory Purpose: Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for Equal Protection and Conspiracy Claims Challenging Urban Redevelopment Enforcement

Comparator Specificity and Discriminatory Purpose: Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for Equal Protection and Conspiracy Claims Challenging Urban Redevelopment Enforcement

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Comparator Specificity and Discriminatory Purpose: Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for Equal Protection and Conspiracy Claims Challenging Urban Redevelopment Enforcement Introduction In April Norman...
Sixth Circuit: § 1983 Procedural Due Process Claims Accrue No Later Than the Last Denial of Process, and Michigan’s No‑Equitable‑Tolling Regime Applies

Sixth Circuit: § 1983 Procedural Due Process Claims Accrue No Later Than the Last Denial of Process, and Michigan’s No‑Equitable‑Tolling Regime Applies

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Sixth Circuit: § 1983 Procedural Due Process Claims Accrue No Later Than the Last Denial of Process, and Michigan’s No‑Equitable‑Tolling Regime Applies Introduction In Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer...
No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Duty to Reassess; Deadly Force After Threat Is Neutralized Is Clearly Unconstitutional

No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Duty to Reassess; Deadly Force After Threat Is Neutralized Is Clearly Unconstitutional

Date: Oct 19, 2025
No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Duty to Reassess; Deadly Force After Threat Is Neutralized Is Clearly Unconstitutional Introduction In Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville,...
No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms that Post‑Neutralization Force Violates Clearly Established Law and Applies Barnes’s Totality-of-Circumstances Framework

No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms that Post‑Neutralization Force Violates Clearly Established Law and Applies Barnes’s Totality-of-Circumstances Framework

Date: Oct 19, 2025
No Bright-Line “Five-Second Rule”: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms that Post‑Neutralization Force Violates Clearly Established Law and Applies Barnes’s Totality-of-Circumstances Framework Introduction In...
No Five‑Second Rule: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Ban on Deadly Force After Incapacitation and Aligns Excessive‑Force Review with Barnes’s Totality‑of‑Circumstances Framework

No Five‑Second Rule: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Ban on Deadly Force After Incapacitation and Aligns Excessive‑Force Review with Barnes’s Totality‑of‑Circumstances Framework

Date: Oct 19, 2025
No Five‑Second Rule: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Ban on Deadly Force After Incapacitation and Aligns Excessive‑Force Review with Barnes’s Totality‑of‑Circumstances Framework Introduction In Chelesy...
PLRA Screening Must Ordinarily Permit Amendment; Mattress Deprivation Alone Insufficient to Plead Eighth Amendment Violation Without Specific Risk of Serious Harm

PLRA Screening Must Ordinarily Permit Amendment; Mattress Deprivation Alone Insufficient to Plead Eighth Amendment Violation Without Specific Risk of Serious Harm

Date: Oct 19, 2025
PLRA Screening Must Ordinarily Permit Amendment; Mattress Deprivation Alone Insufficient to Plead Eighth Amendment Violation Without Specific Risk of Serious Harm Introduction In Darrin Bass v....
Concrete Proof, Not Promissory Assertions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Means to Depart” Showing for Voluntary Departure Motions to Reopen

Concrete Proof, Not Promissory Assertions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Means to Depart” Showing for Voluntary Departure Motions to Reopen

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Concrete Proof, Not Promissory Assertions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Means to Depart” Showing for Voluntary Departure Motions to Reopen Introduction In Juan Carlos Pastor-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi,...
Clarifying the Fentanyl “Misrepresentation/Marketing” Enhancement: Sixth Circuit Defines “Knowingly Misrepresented” and “Knowingly Marketed” under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(13)

Clarifying the Fentanyl “Misrepresentation/Marketing” Enhancement: Sixth Circuit Defines “Knowingly Misrepresented” and “Knowingly Marketed” under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(13)

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Clarifying the Fentanyl “Misrepresentation/Marketing” Enhancement: Sixth Circuit Defines “Knowingly Misrepresented” and “Knowingly Marketed” under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(13) Case: United States v....
Clarifying the Nexus: Parole-Registered Residence and a Single Curbside Transaction Can Establish Probable Cause to Search a Known Drug Dealer’s Home

Clarifying the Nexus: Parole-Registered Residence and a Single Curbside Transaction Can Establish Probable Cause to Search a Known Drug Dealer’s Home

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Clarifying the Nexus: Parole-Registered Residence and a Single Curbside Transaction Can Establish Probable Cause to Search a Known Drug Dealer’s Home Introduction In United States v. Devin Long, No....
Probable Cause Persistence Permits Multi‑Year, Multi‑Stage Searches of Secured Digital Devices

Probable Cause Persistence Permits Multi‑Year, Multi‑Stage Searches of Secured Digital Devices

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Probable Cause Persistence Permits Multi‑Year, Multi‑Stage Searches of Secured Digital Devices Introduction In United States v. Joshua White, No. 25-5158 (6th Cir. Oct. 17, 2025) (not recommended for...
Drawing the Line Between “Misrepresentation” and “Marketing” Under §2D1.1(b)(13): The Sixth Circuit’s Textual Blueprint in United States v. Matthews & Livingston

Drawing the Line Between “Misrepresentation” and “Marketing” Under §2D1.1(b)(13): The Sixth Circuit’s Textual Blueprint in United States v. Matthews & Livingston

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Drawing the Line Between “Misrepresentation” and “Marketing” Under §2D1.1(b)(13): The Sixth Circuit’s Textual Blueprint in United States v. Matthews & Livingston Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Willful Blindness, Advice-of-Compliance Limits, and Rule 403 Gatekeeping in Healthcare Fraud: The Sixth Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Oliver Jenkins

Willful Blindness, Advice-of-Compliance Limits, and Rule 403 Gatekeeping in Healthcare Fraud: The Sixth Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Oliver Jenkins

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Willful Blindness, Advice-of-Compliance Limits, and Rule 403 Gatekeeping in Healthcare Fraud: The Sixth Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Oliver Jenkins Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Good-Faith Reliance Requires Full Disclosure; Willful Blindness Can Prove Knowledge (Not Agreement) in Healthcare-Fraud Conspiracies

Good-Faith Reliance Requires Full Disclosure; Willful Blindness Can Prove Knowledge (Not Agreement) in Healthcare-Fraud Conspiracies

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance Requires Full Disclosure; Willful Blindness Can Prove Knowledge (Not Agreement) in Healthcare-Fraud Conspiracies Commentary on United States v. Sherry-Ann Jenkins, Nos....
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons Case: United States v. Dalton Samuel...
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

Date: Oct 18, 2025
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting Introduction In United...
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence Introduction In United States v. Kenneth Evans, the...
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment

Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment Introduction In Darryl...
Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed (Palmer v. Department of the Air Force)

Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed (Palmer v. Department of the Air Force)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed Introduction This commentary...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert